|

Rwanda is in for a long fight; but will always win

Shyaka Kanuma.

Shyaka Kanuma.

DR Congo information minister and government spokesperson Lam­bert Mende lies. By now it has become a truism. The man tells such out­rageous, and easily debunked falsehoods one who turns on the TV and watches him will think this is a comedian engaged in some parody of lies. Until you notice all those props – the name tag on the desk, the little flag beside it, the fact that he is being interviewed on non-comedy TV – and real­ize, holy s#@t! The fellow actually speaks for a government. A government made up of comedians and buffoons; a government whose writ does not extend much beyond the confines of the dilapidated capital Kin­shasa. But a government nonetheless.

Listening to Lambert Mende, to Ray­mond Tshibanda (DRC foreign affairs minister, too a pathological liar) and other Congolese “dignitaries” carry on with all their falsehoods about Rwanda, I always tell people Kigali is quite lucky to have these kinds of individuals as enemies. They have been accusing us of sponsoring rebel groups in their country, but without a shred of credible evidence, only lying loudly and hoping the lies stick. They have been accusing Rwanda of being their num­ber one enemy, only for facts to surface, such as the one that recently came to light, whereby Rwanda has been providing co­vert military aid to help neutralize desta­bilizing FDLR rebels in parts of Eastern Congo who have for years been robbing, and killing and raping indiscriminately.

If Congolese government officials were just a little bit more intelligent in their ly­ing; if they were a little more organized in their activities, even a little more re­sponsible in their duties towards the or­dinary Congolese they claim to represent, I suspect Rwanda would be in turmoil by now. If the Congolese looked more cred­ible in presenting their cooked up accusa­tions against Kigali, it would serve better their masters Monusco, the UN so-called peace-keeping force and other powerful actors like the blatantly political Human Rights Watch whose autocratic head Ken Roth (yes, Ken Roth, who has been at the helm of HRW since 1993 is an autocrat ev­ery inch as much as Vladimir Putin or Teo­doro Obiang and others like that (except that Roth doesn’t run a country) due to his propensity to crucify – on the basis of the most cooked up claims and canards – gov­ernments and leaders that he, for his own reasons, hates).

Do not doubt it: the combination of a couple of facts, a) that Rwanda is a poor African country dependent on foreign aid, and with very few natural resources at its disposal and b) that arrayed against Kigali are some groups whose influence and voic­es reach in the highest echelons of Western power, i.e. the same powers which may determine who of the world’s less power­ful or influential ends up a pariah, or in the International Criminal Court means that by now the Rwandan leadership would be in a state of instability. Very few Rwandan military leaders would be daring to step out of the country. Donors of aid would be falling over each other to see who cut more than the other. Rwandans would be in a high state of uncertainty about the future, turning against each other, and against the leadership. The gains of the past eighteen years would be experiencing assault on so many levels… less unity, less reconcilia­tion, less stability, less economic growth…

I do not exaggerate. That is where we would be if all the negative elements ganged up against Rwanda were succeed­ing in their objectives, and I am not talking only of the Congolese and their masters Monusco, HRW, (and of course the UN “group of experts” headed by Steve Hege whose main expertise is writing lynch-mob reports that nevertheless do not stand up to half a minute of scrutiny). I am talking about everyone, from French judge Jean Louis Bruguiere and his issuance of inter­national arrest warrants against top Rwan­dan military and civilian leaders on notori­ously trumped up charges, to genocidaires in exile to genocide deniers and trivializ­ers… their objectives have been to do ev­erything possible in their means to dele­gitimize President Kagame and the RPF government; to progressively rub the gloss of Rwanda’s success off and slowly turn us into a pariah in the international commu­nity; to slowly weaken all our institution and finally, in the long run achieve what they thirst for: regime change in Rwanda, in favor of a client government beholden to foreign interests, to their interests above anything else. Whatever the costs all this would be to the ordinary Rwandan, you or me, these powerful international players have absolutely no concern.

But they have miscalculated. At every turn. If Rwanda’s opponents have been George Foreman, brutally hammering away at an opponent and hoping to over­whelm with sheer physical power, Kigali has been Muhammad Ali, rope-a-doping this way and that, conserving energy, de­livering stinging, well-timed shots, induc­ing the opponent into all kinds of silly mis­takes, and setting him up for the knockout punch.

Kigali has intelligently cultivated pow­erful friends… Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Rick Warren, Bill Gates and many others like that… who are very effective spokes­people, talking up Rwanda’s achieve­ments in delivering on good governance and making a positive improvement in all spheres of Rwandan life. Kagame has been quite skillful in choosing which friends best help our interests, while giving us lee­way to determine how to run our affairs. Rwanda has intelligent, articulate people speaking for us. Louise Mushikiwabo is simply devastating when she speaks be­fore a group. When she recently debunked the numerous falsehoods in the GoE re­port at the UN, she went with three other individuals, and she was well-armed with the facts. She left them open mouthed by the ease with which she undid the GoE’s “case”. On the other hand the Congolese who were supposed to make a case for Kinshasa entered, forty strong, and they were loud and chaotic, and within a few seconds every objective observer could immediately make a quick assessment of where problems in their country actually stem from.

Rwanda’s enemies are not about to give up. But against an organized Rwanda, with truth on its side, they will never win.

 

Follow Shyaka Kanuma on Twitter: @ShyakaKanuma

Posted by on Sep 17 2012. Filed under Opinion, Other News, Weekly Highlights. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

10 Comments for “Rwanda is in for a long fight; but will always win”

  1. Dear Shyaka,
    I couldn’t agree with you more about the propensity to lie that characterises Congolese officialdom and their most dedicated enablers among the so-called international community. You only needed to watch their unfunny clown of an ambassador in Paris appearing on France24 yesterday to recall the famous question and answer: how do you know a Congolese official is lying? Answer: their lips move, or a letter or an article appears in a newspaper! That this character is a habitual liar is not a surprise. After all his president is known as someone whose word means absolutely nothing, and ambassadors are nothing if not their masters’ alter ego. My problem is with third parties who allow these nincompoops to get away with clearly infantile dissembling of the kind of ‘dog ate my homework’. The softball questions from the so-called interviewer were a wonder to behold!
    Apart from these kinds of enablers, however, the most important facilitator of Congolese lying and generalised bad behaviour seems to be the low expectations that the “international community” now accepts as a Congolese standard. Their officials, from president to the lowest clerk, military commanders and provincial governors, can all loot the public treasury, allow their indisciplined leaderless and never-paid rabble (aka soldiers for lack of another appellation) to loot, rape and murder the very people they are supposed to protect, all without any fear of sanctions from the “international community”. In the end, since the Congolese know they face no downside from even more serious transgressions, why would they fear any negative consequences from being caught out lying, especially when they know they will be abetted in this by MONUSCO and the UN Security Council’s own so-called experts? We have here a perfect case of what economists call moral hazard; the knowledge that one will not be required to face the negative consequences of one’s own bad behaviour.

  2. I have come to enjoy Mwene Kalinda’s insight and analysis over time in this newspaper’s space. I wish he could write a column. Would be interesting reading without a shadow of doubt.

  3. Dear Marko,
    A heartfelt thank you.

  4. Dear Marko,
    Mwene Kalinda is Shyaka Kanuma and he writes many columns for this paper.

  5. Er … my dear Bruno Stachel, I thank you too for such an exceptional compliment! Hopefully Shyaka will similarly consider it in the same spirit as I do.

  6. Dear Mr. Stachel,
    Indeed I take it as a great compliment that you would think Mwene Kalinda is my avatar in these commentary sections. My only problem with Mr. Satchel’s assumption is it indirectly accusing us of some kind of duplicity in that I would be writing columns or other articles and then assuming some disguise to comment on them, or on what others are saying. This is not the case. In fact if you check other websites, such as The New Times’s, you will discover that the prolific Mwene Kalinda is a frequent contributor there as well.
    having said this, may I take up Marko’s suggestion and invite Mwene Kalinda to write us a weekly column in the Rwanda Focus? It would be a great addition indeed.
    Shyaka Kanuma
    Chief Editor
    The Rwanda Focus

    • Dear Shyaka, Mwene Kalinda writes in other papers it is true I have seen because I read all English papers in the region in an attempt to learn some English. This however does not mean that he is not who I suspected him to be. Now that you baptise me SATCHEL how do you like it when I call you SAKI for Shyaka.

  7. It would be both an honour and a pleasure. I will get in touch soon and directly to discuss the modalities.

  8. But where the heck did Bruno Stachel get the idea that Shyaka and Mwene Kalinda are one and the same?

    Anyway I enjoy a good read and Mwene Kalinda’s writing is way up there with the best journalists in this country of ours even though he mostly writes comments on articles and columns.

  9. Mwene Kalinda Congratulations, it’s about time you contributed an original piece because you obviously have talent. Can’t wait to read your column.

Comments are closed

Recently Commented

  • Mauricio J. Bowen: Somalis are supported in this effort by the United Nations Joint Programme on Local Governance and...
  • Semy Page: Now Kigali is a complete city,..congz to the manager for this creative idea..cant wait for 5D viewing.
  • thomas sankara: i would love to be the first student.
  • Syed Wajahat Ahmed: Rwandair will take Serena Hotel in consideration any time there is a need of a hotel when...
  • John Kamba: The people in Uganda re-writing Amin’s history are generally the baganda. They don’t want to...